US Justice Department Defends Trump Travel Ban


The US justice department has defended President Donald Trump’s travel ban and urged an appeals court to reinstate it in the interests of national security.

A 15-page brief argued it was a “lawful exercise of the president’s authority” and not a ban on Muslims.

The executive order temporarily banned entry for all refugees and visitors from seven mainly Muslim countries.

A hearing has been set for Tuesday on whether to allow or reject the ban.

The filing was made to the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in response to the halting of Mr Trump’s order on Friday by a federal judge in Washington state.

The judge had argued the ban was unconstitutional and harmful to the state’s interests.

As a result, people from the seven countries – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen – with valid visas were able to travel to the US again.

The brief filed on Monday evening said the Washington court had “erred in entering an injunction barring enforcement of the order”.

“But even if some relief were appropriate, the court’s sweeping nationwide injunction is vastly overbroad,” the department of justice added.

The key arguments in the brief are:

  • the president is best placed to make decisions about national security
  • it is “incorrect” to call it a ban on Muslims because the seven countries were identified for their terror risk
  • the executive order is therefore “neutral with respect to religion”
  • aliens outside the US have no rights to due process

Former secretaries of state John Kerry and Madeleine Albright and former CIA director Leon Panetta have joined others in drafting a letter which describes the travel ban as ineffective, dangerous and counterproductive.

And lawyers for tech firms including Apple and Google have also lodged arguments with the court, saying that the travel ban would harm their companies by making it more difficult to recruit employees.

Mr Trump’s defence is similar to the department of justice argument – that national security is at risk.

The president has attacked the “so-called” judge behind the Washington ruling, and said: “If something happens blame him and court system.”

This site is using SEO Baclinks plugin created by and Locco.Ro
About the Author